Monday, 14 January 2013

Les Miserables 2012


Somehow I've escaped seeing any version of Les Miserables til now. Well, I suppose I've actively avoided it. I have always thought of myself as someone who doesn't like musicals. I think I'm changing my mind about that. Or perhaps it's a bit like a vegetable you say you don't like, but then you haven't really tried it, and when you do actually try it you find you don't mind it, or perhaps even quite like it.

I should have known that I would enjoy Les Miserables, despite the near incessant singing (there is a bare minimum of actual speech throughout the whole movie). After all, I do have rather an enduring passion with all things French, and Parisian in particular. And this is a rather Parisian story. In my ignorance I had thought that it was a story of the French Revolution, but Les Mis is set some 20-40 years after those extraordinary events of 1789. The story first starts in 1815, and the major part of the action takes place in 1832. The Book Haven helps explain the history of the events portrayed in Les Miserables.

At the heart of Les Miserables is an ongoing animosity over years between policeman Javert (Russell Crowe) and former convict Jean Valjean (Hugh Jackman). Victor Hugo's powerful story makes us consider the poverty, ill health and poor circumstances that much of the French populace has endured over time, and indeed many people around the world still do.

The movie has some wonderful performances, and spectacular imagery. I'm not a Russell Crowe fan, and found him rather wooden throughout, I hadn't realised that he had such a major role. Anne Hathaway is very good as Fantine, and her plight is particularly moving. Young Daniel Huttlestone is extraordinary as Gavroche.  Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter were brilliant in providing some light relief as the innkeepers. I thought Samantha Barks was the standout as their daughter Eponine.

Sadly I haven't read any Victor Hugo as yet. From my limited dabblings with French classics (Madame Bovary, The Three Musketeers) I expect that I will like his writings.  When I was last in Paris in 2010 I had a wonderful visit to the Musee Victor Hugo. I'm still planning on taking my copy of Notre Dame de Paris with me to Paris this year, which is a sensible size to try and read on holiday, but now I find myself wanting to read Les Miserables. Yes, the TBR just grew again.


7 comments:

Paulita said...

Thanks for the honest review of Les Mis. So often people gush about the whole thing. My daughter cried through the entire movie. I haven't seen it yet, but I plan to.
Thanks for playing along today. Here’s my Dreaming of France meme

Esme said...

You can come stay with me in France. Even if the dream never pans out it is always fun to dream.

I have not yet seen Les. Mis. but was very surprised to hear the large role Crowe had. Not that I can say who I would have cast-it would not be him.

Jackie/Jake said...

Thanks for the review, I am looking forward to seeing it. I like Crowe but he has had some awful reviews for his performance.

Sim said...

Oh I am one of those 'gushers' Paulita mentioned, I'm sure, LOL!
I am so glad you enjoyed it - poor Russell Crowe; he is getting it coming and going but I think you know I rather appreciate his style.
I fell head over heels over little Gavroche - cute without being that saccharine and thought both Samantha Barks and Eddie Redmayne were vocally spectacular.

Kath Lockett said...

You MUST read Victor Hugo's original work (often published as two separate novels). It explains - in the most fascinating and poetic detail - everything. One of my all-time favourites.

Hugh, wooden? I thought he was very emotional, raw and will utterly deserve the Academy Award when he wins it :)

Dianne said...

I'm off to see Les Miserable this morning .... I've seen the play plus the earlier film starring GĂ©rard Depadeu so I know the storyline but I'm really looking forward to this event .... Two top Australian actors .


"All Things French"

Amy Meyer said...

You.ve changed my mind about seeing the movie with this great post. I had pretty much decided not to see it for a variety of reasons including that although I enjoy Broadway musicals, I'm not as much a fan of movie musicals. Also, I saw the musical twice on Broadway and loved it...the costumes, the sets, the performances, the entire show was riveting. I couldn't believe anything could compare but I keep hearing praise about the movie. Your discussion of the events and the Paris setting reminded me what the story is all about and why it's so worthwhile, plus I am a fan of much of the cast...now to decide between the cinema or DVD? Probably the cinema since I don't have a big screen tv!